4. Practical
4.7 The Process
 
2. Technical
2.1 Coverage
2.2 High Tech
2.3 Lo-Fi
2.4 Dissemination
2.5 Languages
2.6 Lasting
     Infrastructure
2.7 Overlay
2.8 Figures
3. Social
3.1 The Electorate
3.2 Biggest Problems
3.3 The Questions
3.4 History of
     Democracy
3.5 Who Runs
     the World
3.6 Who Owns      The Wealth
3.7 The Will
     of the People
4. Practical
4.1 Resolution
     of Suffering
4.2 Financing
4.3 Implementation
4.4 Security
4.5 De-Centralization
4.6 Humanpower
4.7 The Process
4.8 Timeline

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



What would the worst-case scenario be?

The early phases of the referendum promote communication, understanding and mutual respect across international borders. The process itself permanently improves our physical infrastructure. All hardware has been designed for dual-use purposes and is intended to remain in the field to serve alongside newly established communication networks. The long-term solutions proposed by the referendum promise far-reaching and lasting benefits to the great majority of all people.

Poverty and suffering on a vast scale is not a natural state of affairs. The current level of inequality and insecurity is an artificial phenomenon that is deliberately kept this way. The disenfranchised segment of the world population doesn't aspire to a life of luxury. Most people just want a chance to live a healthy existence, with equal opportunities and without being taken advantage of. This is not too much to ask for.

To fix the underlying causes to the problems is well within our reach. The problems themselves are completely resolvable and cheap to rectify. Any improvement, no matter how small, is a step in the right direction. If just one child has a little less hunger along the way, then attempting to jump all the hurdles has been worthwhile.

In the best-case scenario we fix all human suffering.





 
espanol